The first customer was a 48-year-old Elementary School Teacher who has spent her whole life in Wichita Falls. She said that she initially found the insurance agency through a reference from a family member. She found the address through Google and got her quote on-site. She shared that she was not able to see what she was looking for on the Holub Insurance web page, and when I asked her about it, she said:
“The website was confusing and inconvenient; I’d rather speak to a person to get a quote.”
She did not question the professionalism of the Holub Insurance agents. She was satisfied with the integrity of the people who served her and only had negative comments about the web page.
The second customer was a 32-year-old Library Associate who has only been in Wichita Falls for three years. She found the insurance agency through Google and got her quote over the phone. She believed that the design of the current web page is a “ little busy.” After we spoke about her opinion of the web page, she shared:
“It takes too long anytime I want to make changes to my insurance, and I’m uncomfortable giving my information online.”
After I conducted the interview, I was convinced that, on the whole, customers are satisfied with the service of Holub Insurance Agency. Still, they wish they had a more functional website.
After speaking to the second customer, I felt that it is vital to my project to understand how important is the quick response and quote-taking process to the average insurance user. The lady was the type of customer that believed that it is safer to provide personal information in-person, and she would rather do that than submit her personal information online. I wondered what percentage of average users will rather take their quote online than in person. For that purpose, I conducted a user survey.